+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 39.7% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $73.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($73.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:19.5%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:59.1%(+39.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:19.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:59.1%(+39.7%)
Providers:2