+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 1.5% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 62.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. Command R+ is $13.75 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
13 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($13.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:40.7%(+1.5%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:39.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:40.7%(+1.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:39.2%
Providers:2