+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 33.3% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $4.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.7%), MATH (97.9%), IFEval (93.9%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($4.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:14.4%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:47.8%(+33.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:14.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:47.8%(+33.3%)
Providers:2