+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 51.1% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 days newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:14.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:65.6%(+51.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:14.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:65.6%(+51.1%)
Providers:0