+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct leads with 11.1% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.3% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ScienceQA (91.3%), POPE (86.1%), MMBench (81.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 days newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:29.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:41.0%(+11.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:41.0%(+11.1%)
Providers:0