+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 49.4% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
20 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:24.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:74.3%(+49.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:24.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:74.3%(+49.4%)
Providers:0