Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads with 33.5% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.4% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.8%), MT-Bench (93.5%), MBPP (88.2%). It supports a 139K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
20 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Command R+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Command R+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere
Command R+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Command R+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together