Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads with 24.8% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $0.65 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.6%), MT-Bench (87.5%), HumanEval (84.8%). It supports a 139K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
20 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Command R+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Command R+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere
Command R+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Command R+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Together