+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 43.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.9% across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (96.4%), Android Control Low_EM (93.7%), ChartQA (89.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:12.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:55.8%(+43.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:12.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:55.8%(+43.3%)
Providers:0