+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 13.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is $0.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:29.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:43.2%(+13.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:43.2%(+13.4%)
Providers:3