+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:40.2%(+5.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:40.2%(+5.7%)
Providers:0