+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 25.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Gemma 3 27B is $0.95 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:70.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:95.9%(+25.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:70.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:95.9%(+25.2%)
Providers:2