+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 11.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
10 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:81.7%(+11.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:70.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:81.7%(+11.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:70.6%
Providers:0