+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GLM-4.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Command R+ is $1.55 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
11 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($1.55 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2