+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GLM-4.6
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. Command R+ is $1.35 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
1 year newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($1.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2