+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-4 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Command R+ is $38.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
4 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($38.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Input:$10.00
Output:$30.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:75.7%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:86.5%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:75.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:86.5%(+10.8%)
Providers:2