+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 190.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Command R+ is $88.75 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($88.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:83.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:89.7%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:83.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:89.7%(+6.5%)
Providers:2