+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-4.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.5 leads with 20.7% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4.5. Command R+ is $223.75 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.5 was developed as an intermediate advancement between GPT-4 and GPT-5, designed to incorporate incremental improvements in reasoning, factuality, and instruction-following. Built to bridge generational capabilities while maintaining compatibility with existing applications, it represents a refinement of the GPT-4 architecture with enhanced performance characteristics.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
GPT-4.5
OpenAI
2025-02-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($223.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Input:$75.00
Output:$150.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:73.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Average Score:93.9%(+20.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:73.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Avg Score:93.9%(+20.7%)
Providers:1