+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Command R+ is $11.25 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
24 days newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($11.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:75.7%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:85.7%(+10.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:75.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:85.7%(+10.0%)
Providers:2