+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
7 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:74.6%(+11.2%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:63.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:74.6%(+11.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:63.4%
Providers:0