+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 4.7% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
8 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:67.6%(+4.7%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:62.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:67.6%(+4.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:62.9%
Providers:0