+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Grok 4 Fast
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok 4 Fast offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Command R+. Grok 4 Fast is $0.55 cheaper per million tokens. Grok 4 Fast supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Fast is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (95.0%), HMMT 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2025 (92.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
12 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Grok 4 Fast
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.50($0.55 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1