+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $0.95 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 month newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:76.5%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:69.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:76.5%(+6.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:69.7%
Providers:2