+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $0.85 cheaper per million tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
6 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:75.7%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:81.0%(+5.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:75.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:81.0%(+5.3%)
Providers:1