+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 21.3% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $73.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
3 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($73.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:73.2%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:94.5%(+21.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:73.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:94.5%(+21.3%)
Providers:2