+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $4.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
5 months newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($4.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:75.7%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:86.9%(+11.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:75.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:86.9%(+11.2%)
Providers:2