+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 8.9% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
7 days newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:74.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:83.5%(+8.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:74.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:83.5%(+8.9%)
Providers:0