+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 119.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $0.95 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Command R+ is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
18 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:75.7%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:69.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:75.7%(+6.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:69.2%
Providers:1