+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $0.65 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
20 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($0.65 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:70.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:91.6%(+20.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:70.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:91.6%(+20.9%)
Providers:1