+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 1.2% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $1.07 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
20 days newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($1.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:74.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:75.8%(+1.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:74.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:75.8%(+1.2%)
Providers:4