+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Command R+ vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Command R+ offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($0.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Command R+
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cohere
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1