+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:30.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:34.6%(+4.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:30.1%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:34.6%(+4.5%)
Providers:0