+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 45.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B is $2.35 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($2.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:82.9%(+45.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:37.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:82.9%(+45.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:37.4%
Providers:2