+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 60.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
29 days newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:81.7%(+60.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:21.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:81.7%(+60.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:21.3%
Providers:0