Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 1.6% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is $0.65 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek-R1-0528
GLM-4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
DeepSeek-R1-0528
GLM-4.5
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita
DeepSeek-R1-0528
GLM-4.5
DeepSeek-R1-0528
GLM-4.5
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval