+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 9.9% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
26 days newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:34.4%(+9.9%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:24.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:34.4%(+9.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:24.5%
Providers:0