Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 24.1% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 262.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Kimi K2 0905
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Kimi K2 0905
Available providers and their performance metrics
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Kimi K2 0905
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905
Novita
ZeroEval