+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 13.2% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
1 month newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15($0.22 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:68.1%(+13.2%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:54.9%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Coding44.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Coding71.6%(+27.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:68.1%(+13.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:54.9%
Providers:1