+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
3 months newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:73.2%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:58.4%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Coding44.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+21.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:73.2%(+14.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:58.4%
Providers:0