+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 48.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $2.62 cheaper per million tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($2.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:81.0%(+48.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:81.0%(+48.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1