+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 34.3% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $1.90 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($1.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:81.0%(+34.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:46.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:81.0%(+34.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:46.7%
Providers:5