+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 15.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. Llama 4 Maverick is $1.88 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
1 month newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($1.88 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:79.8%(+15.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:64.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 45.04 tok/s
Latency: 0.61ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Novita
Throughput: 37.96 tok/s
Latency: 1.18ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:79.8%(+15.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:64.6%
Providers:7