Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B was created through knowledge distillation from DeepSeek-R1 into a Llama-based architecture, designed to transfer reasoning capabilities to a widely-used open-source foundation. Built to combine DeepSeek's reasoning innovations with Llama's ecosystem compatibility, it enables broader access to advanced reasoning techniques.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepInfra

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Gemini 2.5 Flash

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval