+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B leads with 14.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B was created through knowledge distillation from DeepSeek-R1 into a Llama-based architecture, designed to transfer reasoning capabilities to a widely-used open-source foundation. Built to combine DeepSeek's reasoning innovations with Llama's ecosystem compatibility, it enables broader access to advanced reasoning techniques.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
1 month newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($0.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Average Score:65.2%(+14.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:50.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Avg Score:65.2%(+14.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:50.5%
Providers:9