+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:25.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:48.6%(+23.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:25.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:48.6%(+23.3%)
Providers:1