+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 23.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
4 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:25.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:49.2%(+23.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:25.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:49.2%(+23.8%)
Providers:1