+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B leads with 6.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:25.4%(+6.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:19.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:25.4%(+6.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:19.0%
Providers:0