+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 34.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (83.9%), AIME 2024 (52.7%), GPQA (33.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:12.5%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:47.4%(+34.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:12.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:47.4%(+34.9%)
Providers:0