+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 49.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (83.9%), AIME 2024 (52.7%), GPQA (33.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:12.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:62.2%(+49.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:12.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:62.2%(+49.7%)
Providers:7