+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B was created through distillation into an ultra-compact Qwen architecture, designed to enable reasoning capabilities on resource-constrained devices. Built with just 1.5 billion parameters, it brings advanced analytical techniques to edge computing and mobile scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
12 days newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Average Score:33.8%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:25.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Avg Score:33.8%(+8.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:25.2%
Providers:0